Question Description
- Feagin, J. R. (2010). The white racial frame: Centuries of racial framing and counter-framing. Preface (vi-ix); Ch. 1 (pp. 1-3 [stop @ “mainstream social science”]; optional pp. 9-21); Ch. 2 (pp. 23-37)
- Kim, C. (1999). The Racial Triangulation of Asian Americans. (pp. 105 122 [stop at “3.2 Affirmative Action”)
- Pulido, L. (2006). Black, Brown, Yellow, and Left: Radical Activism in Los Angeles (pp. 15-33)
- Powell, J. (2013). Deepening our understanding of structural marginalization. (pp. 1-3)
Note: Feel free to create a Sketchboard (Links to an external site.) (instead of a written CRR) in response to the CRR questions. You can then use Screencastify to narrate how the images/symbols and connections you make answer the questions below. Then, you can submit the link to your screencast through this assignment page.
Questions to Answer:
- What is the white racial frame and how does it operate?
- What is a “field of racial positions” and “racial triangulation”? And how does Kim argue that Asian Americans have been “racially triangulated” within this “field of racial positions”?
- What is “differential racialization” and the factors that are part of the processes by which it happens?
- What are “racial hierarchies” and the process by which they are created?
Pick Three to Answer:
- What is the relationship of Feagin’s theory of the “white racial frame,” and Kim’s notion of “discourse” as a process that generates a “field of racial positions”?
- What does Kim argue are the key processes by which Asian Americans experience “racial triangulation”?
- What are the relationships between the white racial frame and the model minority myth?
- How does Pulido argue that the process of racialization is one that is distinctive and specific?
- How does going beyond the Black/White binary relate to powell’s statements regarding our need to move past “disparities” into deeper understandings of “structural marginalization”?
- Pulido argues that there is a dialectic that occurs between processes of class formation and racial ideologies. What examples does she use to support this claim?
Rubric
CRR 5 Rubric
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswer CRR QuestionsAnswered all CRR questions in a thorough Manner. |
|
8.0 pts |
||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeText ConversationsPlace texts in conversation with each other. |
|
6.0 pts |
||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConversation with the textsIndividual analysis of texts |
|
6.0 pts |
||
Total Points: 20.0 |